Home > Keyboard Release, Keyboards > New Keyboard Layout Project: The Optimal Layout?

New Keyboard Layout Project: The Optimal Layout?

MTGAP 3.5 is the best layout, even with several criteria changes:

' y l d b  j p u m ,
o i t s c  h n e r a
x q w g z  v f . k ;

So the question now is, is it really the best layout?

-Low same finger, most of which is on the strong middle or index finger.
-A lot of keys are in good positions. I very much like the position of l (ell).
-Very good inward rolls.
-A good balance of outward rolls to satisfy both those who find them easy and those who don’t like them.
-A good-looking home row.
-The word “are” is super easy to type.

-Same finger, while low, could be better.
-hand alternation is pretty bad, though better than Capewell or Arensito.

How does it compare to Colemak, MTGAP 2.0, and Carpalx GYLMW?

Distance (meters)

MTGAP 3.5 7869
MTGAP 2.0 7875
Carpalx   7972
Colemak   8001

Inward Rolls

MTGAP 3.5 7.66%
MTGAP 2.0 7.04%
Colemak   4.88%
Carpalx  3.19%

Outward Rolls

MTGAP 2.0 7.11%
MTGAP 3.5 4.98%
Carpalx   4.07%
Colemak   3.76%

Same Hand

Carpalx   16.51%
Colemak   21.17%
MTGAP 3.5 23.40%
MTGAP 2.0 24.86%

Same Finger

Colemak   0.81%
MTGAP 2.0 0.89%
MTGAP 3.5 0.90%
Carpalx   1.99%

Row Change

Carpalx   7.49%
MTGAP 3.5 8.97%
Colemak   9.03%
MTGAP 2.0 11.97%

Home Row Jump

MTGAP 3.5 0.23%
Carpalx   0.27%
MTGAP 2.0 0.39%
Colemak   0.50%

To Center

MTGAP 2.0 3.16%
Colemak   3.72%
MTGAP 3.5 4.49%
Carpalx   4.98%

The stats are actually pretty jumbled. Both Carpalx and MTGAP use computer programs, so they will likely be very good at a few selected stats. Which they are. MTGAP is best at distance and rolls and good at same finger, while Carpalx is much better at same hand. I don’t think it’s worth it, though.

The question is, are there any problems with MTGAP 3.5, not counting the fact that it does not preserve keyboard shortcuts? (I’m working on a layout that fixes that.)

  1. August 28, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    MTGAP 3.5 is the best

    MTGAP 3.6 0.23%

    I’m Confused

  2. August 30, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    Can you put MTGandP v2.0 here too?

  3. Ulf Bro
    August 31, 2009 at 2:20 am

    I am working on an optimized layout for German and have written my varous tools in Python so far (evaluation, shuffling etc.)
    The good old Dvorak with addition of the 4 special German letters seems to be a lot better than modern, original German, attempts in optimization (like the Neo Layout for example). Paradoxically Dvorak appears to be better at writing German than writing English. But because of the heavy consonant bundeling we type 65 % with right and 35 % with the left hand. On the other hand, these combinations are very pleasant to type (“schr”, “schl”, “rtzt”, “bstr” etc.)
    I would like to get in contact with you to get advice on further development. Even if it seems that development of a German keyboard has to follow other criteria than in English, there is no need to re-invent the wheel.

  1. December 18, 2009 at 9:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: